“The Will to Integrate is Necessary”
CDU politician warns of a split in society over the citizenship law
It is strange indeed. The millions of signatures collected in petitions against the NATO Dual-Track Decision [of 1979] were regarded as a moral victory and as evidence of democratic culture. But the millions of signatures collected against a fundamental amendment to our citizenship law are supposedly immoral and indicative of the demise of political culture.
Yet everyone knows that the coexistence of Germans and our fellow citizens from abroad presents us with certain problems that can’t be talked away. People who broach the subject should not be labeled xenophobic. It must be possible even for us Germans to talk openly about problems concerning the integration of foreign citizens. The general “dual-citizenship” option that the red-green* government coalition intends to introduce will not solve these problems. The language problems in our schools would thus continue to exist.
Those who don’t want to accept the division of our society cannot remain indifferent to the obvious trend toward ghetto-formation, especially in major cities, or to the exclusion of foreigners or even the violence against them. For example, the plight of many young Turkish women, who are closed off from their larger surroundings – not to mention any real participation in social life – alone on the basis of utterly inadequate language skills, cannot be a vision for future coexistence.
Citizens of our country rightly expect honesty in the treatment of the issue – and they expect that politicians will point to realistic solutions. This is not the case with the general possibility of dual citizenship proposed by the new red-green federal government coalition. It would seal the division of our society. Conflicts of loyalty would be the inevitable result. For example, in which country would young people do their military service? Which government would represent the interests of citizens of foreign descent now living in Germany? And which country would be responsible for the protection of these citizens in third countries? Where would claims for social benefits be asserted? Why should fellow citizens of foreign descent have a say in German politics when Germans living abroad have no right to vote? The red-green concept would serve to extend “dual citizenship” further and further to children and children’s children, to reunited families and later arrivals. If a father and mother live here, then no one can blame them for wanting their children with them. But it’s a major problem when children are deliberately sent back to their home country for schooling and then return to us when they’re sixteen – without German schooling and without German language competence.
According to the red-green proposal, every foreigner who has lived here for eight years would in principle be entitled to German – that is, dual – citizenship. This would mean that even members of the terrorist PKK** could become Germans. If the red-green government were to implement the general “dual citizenship,” it would no longer be possible to deport criminals easily. Thus, there’s a danger that Turkish domestic conflicts could be shifted to Germany. That would do a great disservice to peaceful and neighborly coexistence.
* A red-green coalition is a coalition between the SPD and the Green Party – eds.
** Kurdish Workers’ Party – eds.