Tenure track positions for junior professors remain an exception according to the CHE study – despite the fact that three-quarters of university administrators interviewed by the Center for Higher Education Development assessed the quality of the junior professors as high. One-quarter quibbled. Most of the interim evaluations were positive, but the unquestionably high quality of the young professors has not led to new positions or increased demand for one simple reason: at most universities, the classic postdoctoral lecturers and junior professors have to compete against each other. “This competition is wise,” said DHV president Bernhard Kempen.
This may be true. But it is also an unfair battle, since, in the end, the junior professors have a serious competitive disadvantage: not only do they have to teach, often more than the postdoctoral lecturers do, but they also have to conduct exams and frequently also have to participate in the academic self-administration. In appointment decisions, however, the most important criterion is research achievements. And the young academics have little time to do good research. “You can’t make research the main criterion,” said Bremen’s junior professor Dorothea Nolde. Her colleague Dagmar Borchers is also familiar with the daily struggle: “You get very preoccupied with not getting lost in the daily routine.” Florian Buch of the CHE said, “Junior professors have to do a lot of things that don’t add to their list of publications.”
Many also Complete their Second Dissertation, Just in Case
A look at the statistics of the German Research Foundation [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft or DFG] leaves a mixed impression. Whereas young professors in the natural and life sciences are very successful in applying for funds for their research projects, academics in the humanities, social sciences, and engineering fare far below average. “The natural and life sciences are much further along and allow more latitude in career paths,” said Beate Scholz of the DFG. In many academic departments, especially the humanities and social sciences, the exam following the publication of the Habilitation is still a decisive prerequisite for the receipt of a professorial appointment. For this reason, many young academics work on their Habilitation parallel to their primary job as a junior professor. “That is ridiculous on the face of it but makes a lot of sense in individual cases,” said historian Tassilo Schmitt.
As can be expected, completing a second dissertation on the side takes longer than doing it the standard way. This could also be one reason for the decrease in the number of Habilitationen in 2005. The Federal Office of Statistics initially listed the junior professorship as the reason. When asked about it, the office responded: “We will really only be able to say something definitive in a few years.” Also, only a minority of university administrators interviewed by the CHE believed that the Habilitation is losing significance – a vast majority felt that subject-specific procedures have gained greater acceptance.
Small wonder the mood among the junior professors is not as euphoric as it was a few years ago. “I thought it would enjoy greater acceptance,” said Lars Frormann, a young professor in Clausthal and, as head of the Association of Friends of the Junior Professor, a decided lobbyist for the new model. Frormann himself faced obstacles in Clausthal; he had “internal problems finding acceptance” and was not invited to department meetings. Now he is leaving Clausthal, because he received a professorial appointment at the Zwickau Polytechnic. Frormann is in a fortunate situation. He estimates that only about one-third of young academics receive a tenured position. The rest run the risk of being sent into unemployment by their alma mater. “A lot of people will fall through the cracks,” said Frormann. “There simply aren’t enough jobs.”
One reason for the great reservations against the junior professorship is that Edelgard Bulmahn tried to push her idea through with brute force in order to get rid of the Habilitation requirement. She landed, as Bavarian science and research minister Thomas Goppel put it at the time, “on her butt” before the Federal Constitutional Court. The judges considered Bulmahn’s approach competence piracy. They said that education policy is the jurisdiction of the federal states; the federal government had no say in the matter. Buhlmann held fast to her commitment to the young academics; today she still sees her brain child as a “successful measure” that “is no longer seriously questioned” at universities.
Yet hardly any encouraging signals for young professors are coming from the Federal Education Ministry under the leadership of CDU minister Annette Schavan. Ministerial spokesperson Florian Frank characterized the junior professorship as an instrument with which to forge talent, but he stoically referred to talks with the federal states – that is not what a clear commitment to the new model sounds like. “The ministry hasn’t taken a stance yet,” lamented expert Tassilo Schmitt. “The junior professors feel abandoned.” Annette Knaut, president of Thesis, an association of doctoral candidates, complained that “the federal government’s response is very cautious.” And Petra Sitte, education expert for the Left party in the Bundestag, said, “The ministry wants to wait and see.”
The federal government is laying low, most universities are passive, and the junior professors are uncertain. Lars Frormann of the Association of Friends of the Junior Professor summed it up realistically: “I’d do it over again,” he said, having just received a professorial appointment, “but I don’t know if I would recommend that anyone become a junior professor.”
Source: Manuel J. Hartung, “Ein letzter Gruß” [“A Final Farewell”], Die Zeit, July 13, 2006.
Translation: Allison Brown
print version
return to list
previous document